Skip to content
PizzaHQ

Is my pizza right?

Plenty of things people call faults are exactly what a style is meant to be: a soft, wet-looking centre is part of a Neapolitan pizza and a problem in a cracker-thin one. Tick what you see and, if you know it, the style — PizzaHQ judges each observation against that style’s recorded character.

What do you see? (any that apply)

Tick what you see. A verdict appears for each, judged against the style if you chose one.

How this works

Each of the 14 observations has a rule that reads the chosen style's records — its crust structure, recorded textures, bake temperature and the derived positions PizzaHQ uses elsewhere (crispness, airiness, char, chew) — and returns one of four verdicts: expected for this style, acceptable variation, possible fault, or clear fault. The verdict always says which record decided it.

Two observations are faults in every style: a raw, gummy layer under the sauce, and large burnt areas. Everything else depends on what the pizza is meant to be.

A possible or clear fault links straight into the troubleshooter for the matching symptom.

Assumptions

  • Without a style, verdicts are cautious: the tool says when the answer depends on the style.
  • Styles vary between makers; a verdict is about the style's recorded character, not one pizzeria's version.

Limitations

  • It does not judge authenticity. Whether a pizza is a 'real' example of a style is a debate PizzaHQ records positions on, not verdicts.
  • Observations are yours; a photo or a taste can tell you things a checklist cannot.