Skip to content
PizzaHQ

Marketing language

'Artisan', 'wood-fired', and other uncodified claims

Do the words on the menu mean anything?

Several of the terms most used to signal authenticity carry no legal definition, no certification, and no independent verification. Saying so is a factual claim about certification, not a judgement about whether the pizza is good.

PizzaHQ states plainly that the term is not codified. Terms used to imply authenticity that carry no legal, certified, or independently verified meaning.

The documented positions

  1. Certification bodies (AVPN, EU TSG)

    Only membership of a named scheme, shown by a register entry or a registered designation, certifies anything. 'Artisan', 'authentic', 'wood-fired' and 'traditional' are not schemes.

    Reasoning: Certification requires a written specification and an auditing body; none of these words has either.

    Well established

  2. Common restaurant usage

    The words describe genuine intent — hand-made, small-batch, a real wood oven — even without a scheme behind them, and most operators using them are describing something true.

    Reasoning: Absence of certification is not evidence of misuse; it only means the claim is unverifiable from the outside.

    Generally accepted
    • PizzaHQ editorial synthesis — PizzaHQ

Why it is contested

The disagreement is not really about the facts — all sides agree the terms are uncodified — but about whether saying so implies bad faith. It does not.

Related

Artisan(al)Wood-fired (as a menu claim)FlatbreadVerace

Evidence

Strongly supported

All authenticity and classification questions